In the summer of 2013, a young lawyer named William Consovoy appeared on a Brookings Institution panel to discuss his leading role in a recently decided voting-rights case. Just days earlier, the Supreme Court had ruled that certain states, particularly in the South, would no longer need Justice Department approval before redrawing districts,
Long before Donald
Trump defeated Hillary Clinton for this administration last year, this country
was facing steady growing cultural and political tensions rooted in diverging
responses to the continual system, demographic and cultural changes reshaping
American life. But the bruising 2016 competition between,
Trump and Clinton
extended these parts to the new level. In the starkly contrasting structure of
supporting each person inspired, this position served something like a bolt of
light on the starless night: It cleared, with sharp starkness, a political
landscape deeply fractured along lines of race, generation, Course and
geography.
The period was the
eye opener for me. In coastal bubbles the Trump administration was virtually
impossible. Silicon Valley was optimizing at these margins; the primary action
ended, it was picking current fights (sometimes with Thiel affiliates who were
pro-Hillary !) “From my perspective,” Consovoy said, “this is what I would call a modest decision by the court.”In fact, it was a watershed — a declaration that some of the central protections enshrined in the Voting Rights Act of 1965,
The election results
showed something entirely different: 50 percent of voting Americans, and the
age of the electoral college sent the large screw You to the organization and
got Trump. This error is believing that people voted Trump because the majority
of them are anti-Semitic, discriminatory, or otherwise.
Most of them voted
for him despite those feelings, because they need difference in any price.
While not all of these same people, this is the one populist groundswell that
supported Bernie: A huge portion of the people does not think the new
organization is running for them. And they are mostly good.
The presidential
election is mostly depicted as The struggle to get states and their
accompanying electoral votes. Hillary Clinton won Vermont, then she had its
three elected ballots. Donald Trump won AK, then he had its three elected
votes. Whoever takes to 270 or more electoral votes first — the number of the
538 amount — wins the vote. This was the relative
system. Next, we hold down.
The implies that
Donald Trump receives 7 electoral votes, Hillary Clinton receives 7 electoral
votes, and that third-parties at This total have 0 electoral votes. The tallies
to the sum of 14 electoral votes, giving 2 votes unaccounted for. Since Donald Trump
had the most common votes, he obtains those remaining 2 electoral votes. This
last analysis then makes Donald Trump 9 electoral votes and Hillary Clinton 7
electoral votes.